"Just the Facts, Ma'am." - Forbidden Marriages and the Mosaic Law

 


(apologies to Jack Webb, RIP)

“Just the Facts, Ma’am.” – Forbidden Marriages and the Mosaic Law

 Post #3 of the “Eleven Toes” Series


This post covers the Mosaic Law commands contained in Leviticus 18:1-30 & 20:10-21.

Some of the command violations in chapter 20 require execution, with one specifying “they shall be burned to death (v. 14).” In other law violations, beginning in 20:17 (and the generally-stated punishment of ch. 18), God promises that violators “shall be cut off in the sight of the children of their people (20:17),” and other violators will die childless (v. 20-21). Here’s a summary of the passages in chart form!


Now, ignoring the homosexuality, bestiality, and other unions irrelevant to this study (probably each in need of its own post), how many of the other forbidden unions are only blood related? (Answer: A minority are only by blood, some can be by blood but not necessarily, while others are certainly not blood related)

 

Here’s my hypothesis about why these relationships could be forbidden (the spirit of these laws): Clearly, they are all close familial relationships. Not only close, but someone affected by each side of the forbidden union would be or have been in the same immediate family.

·       Every married adult (massively idealistic) has been members of at least two immediate families: 1) the family of origin with parents and siblings and 2) the current family with spouse and children. Any other immediate families, such as with step parents and half or step siblings, or with a subsequent spouse and step children, would also be included in this list. Everyone in these families (outside of spouses) would be expressly forbidden marriage partners.

·       This list continues to (at least most of) the other immediate families of the members of this list; including your grandparents, your parents’ siblings, your sibling’s spouse and children, and your child’s spouse and children.

·       The list also includes many of these relationships to your spouse, such as her parents, siblings, aunts/uncles, and nieces/nephews.

·       Exceptions to this Idea: Great-grandparents forbidden to marry great-grandchildren, or any relationship within the direct line. It’s an absurd and disgusting thought, but simple logic would forbid these unions.

·       A possible gray area: The spouses of your spouse’s siblings. (ex. My wife’s brother’s wife). Is that kind of relationship also off limits? A definite maybe, since these Bible passages are not directly addressing these relationships. (BTW, just for clarification purposes, I would highly NOT RECOMMEND this union, and would refuse to officiate the wedding.)

 

One final consideration: Adoption. While this issue could certainly apply to these laws, adoptions have other laws even more applicable than these. In Jewish custom, every adopted child is a full member of the family, and must be considered as a blood relative would be considered of the same relationship. In the Levitical laws, since step-relationships are viewed with the same kind of validity, adoptions are certainly seriously considered. Note: legal guardianships can also be viewed the same as adoptions (at least in spirit), even if the sibling/cousin relationships are not legally connected to the extent of adoptions.

 

Posts #4 & 5 will go back to the beginning of the world (according to the Bible). Until then…

 

Final Questions:

1.     Do you have any forbidden marriage objections that are not contained in these lists for whatever reason? Cousin marriages, perhaps?

2.     Scenario: You received a wedding announcement from a cousin you haven’t seen in more than a decade, heralding the soon-to-be union of his son to the daughter of his wife. Even if this couple has never lived in the same house as step-siblings, would you have any concerns about this upcoming marriage?


JOY!





Popular posts from this blog

June 8, 2025 Sermon Link - "The 'Three in One' Testifies"

The Elite and the Paupers - Ecclesiastes #13